Human authority over high-risk actions
Policy-classified high-risk actions require explicit human approval before execution. Automation does not bypass accountable decision owners.
Machine-Citable Summary
- AI ethics is implemented as operational controls, not generic principle statements.
- High-risk execution requires human approvals and immutable audit traces.
- Containment readiness is measured through scheduled emergency-stop drills.
Governance
AI Ethics and Safety Posture
Ethics and safety are run as measurable operating requirements. The objective is controlled autonomy with clear human accountability, documented boundaries, and recoverable failure modes.
Traceable and reviewable behavior
Every critical action path is logged with request context, execution identity, tool scope, and approval result for audit review.
Containment over autonomy
Emergency-stop and token-revocation controls are treated as first-class safety systems and exercised through scheduled drills.
Continuous evaluation
Golden set checks, drift thresholds, and remediation owners are required for system promotion and post-deployment operation.